The other day, on WS, someone posted a link to Peter Brendt's blog, and his comments regarding the 48 hours show. I hadn't seen the blog before, and found it interesting. Here's the link:
http://www.brendtandbrendt.com/
If you scroll down and read his comments about being banned from WS, you'll see a pretty fair representation of the types of conflicts Brendt ran into at WS. Brendt feels, generally, that if you didn't perceive a case as he did it's because you're an idiot, and he'd frequently stop just short of saying so directly. That is, of course, rather arrogant, and in moments of candor I'm sure Brendt realizes he's arrogant. But guess what? His posts were always interesting, he does have a background in criminal theory, and it was fun to argue with him about his intransigent attitudes. Not to be, though; at WS disagreement is rabidly non-PC and strictly verboten.
There are, however, some new members there with nice pictures of puppies and smiley emoticons.
No comments:
Post a Comment